Great news, Evan. Mind updating or deleting the wiki page?
-Colin
On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Evan Schoenberg <eva...@dreskin.net> wrote:
> After further evaluation, I am not convinced that there is any difference
> between 1.4b18 and 1.4rc1 in terms of actual memory usage. I suspect that
> due to performance issues introduced in 1.4b20 (which are fixed in 1.4rc2,
> pushed last night), folks checked Activity Monitor ("why is this going so
> slow?!") and noticed the memory usage, assuming it to be a new or causitive
> issue.
>
> David and I discussed the preferences subsystem as one cause of high memory
> usage. Fixing this without causing performance degradation is outside the
> scope of 1.4.0... and such a problem is not a regression.
>
> -Evan
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:31 PM, David Smith <catfish....@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, memory usage should never go up between builds unless there's a major
> feature added that would account for it (64 bit Adium is expected to use more
> for example). Suggested debugging steps:
>
> run leaks Adium > ~/Desktop/AdiumLeaks.txt
> run heap -guessNonObjects -sumObjectFields Adium > ~/Desktop/AdiumHeap.txt
>
> Send both the files that generates on the desktop to one of us for analysis.
>
> David
>
> On Oct 26, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Robert Vehse wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> > is it to be expected that Adium uses a lot more memory in b20 and rc1?
> >
> > This has been reported: https://twitter.com/ziru/status/27751294113.
> > I responded: https://twitter.com/Adium/status/27771115566.
> > Further exchange:
> > - https://twitter.com/ziru/status/27966099959
> > - https://twitter.com/ziru/status/28755152270
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Robbie
> >
>
>
>
