On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Robert Vehse <robert.ve...@freenet.de> wrote: > > Am 07.05.2012 um 21:13 schrieb Evan Schoenberg: > >> >> On May 7, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Eric Richie <e...@adium.im> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Evan Schoenberg <e...@adium.im> wrote: >>>> libpurple has been updated to 2.10.4 with 2 security fixes, and I'd also >>>> like to have us distributing a Developer ID signed binary. >>>> >>>> We may need to include some explicit parameters (the designated >>>> requirement) in the codesign line used in the release script, but I'm not >>>> positive with our current OS X targeting; we're ok on 10.7 without but >>>> 10.6.8 may need >>>> it to behave properly. >>>> >>>> Any objections to a beta in the next couple days? >>>> >>>> -Evan >>> >>> Nope. Let's do it. >>> >>> Are you going to be looking into the parameters? >> >> Yup. I'll take care of it. >> >> -Evan > > Is http://hg.adium.im/adium/rev/c494bae9da94 a good point to branch from?
That looks to be about as good a place as any. -Eric
