> On 16 apr. 2015, at 01:26, Bradley Bunk <bradbun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Good evening,
> 
> I am working on a school project in which I have to give a presentation on a 
> testing tool of choice; I chose the clang static analysis tool. Adium is one 
> of the few projects I have found that actively uses the tool. I am curious to 
> know how and or why the community chose and or chooses to use the tool and or 
> how you integrate it into your build/testing work flow. I apologize if this 
> is not the intended use of this email list, I could not find any 
> documentation on clang and or your testing approach in the wiki (this may be 
> due to my own incompetence and or ignorance.), and I am genuinely curious to 
> know about it and or to be able to test the code my self.
> 
> thank you for your time,
> 
> Bradley Bunk

Hi Bradley,

In the past I’ve used the static analyzer tool a couple of times, mostly for 
the 1.6 branch if I remember correctly. It is not integrated into our workflow 
automatically, I’ve only ran it manually.

I don’t actually know any other static analyzers (especially with support for 
Objective-C), so I can’t answer why I chose it over other things. It worked 
quite well for me (pros: quite fast, easy to understand the warnings it gives, 
easy to use), and it’s even integrated with Xcode (thought I didn’t use that 
myself).

I hope that answers your questions, feel free to ask more, this list is 
definitely the right place for that.

Best regards,
Thijs Alkemade

Reply via email to