Ard,

We have verified that the build failures are resolved.

Series Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 1:58 PM
> To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Ard
> Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Zimmer, Vincent <vincent.zim...@intel.com>;
> Richardson, Brian <brian.richard...@intel.com>; Kinney,
> Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Andrew Fish
> <af...@apple.com>; Leif Lindholm
> <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>; Zeng, Star
> <star.z...@intel.com>; Dong, Eric
> <eric.d...@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>; Gao,
> Liming <liming....@intel.com>; Carsey, Jaben
> <jaben.car...@intel.com>; Shi, Steven
> <steven....@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/7] MdeModulePkg:
> add support for dispatching foreign arch PE/COFF images
> 
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 11:58, Ard Biesheuvel via
> Groups.Io
> <ard.biesheuvel=linaro....@groups.io> wrote:
> >
> > Add the basic plumbing to DXE core, the PCI bus
> driver and the boot manager
> > to allow PE/COFF images to be dispatched that target
> an architecture that is
> > not native for the platform, but which is supported
> by one of potentially
> > several available emulators.
> >
> > One implementation of such an emulator can be found
> here:
> >
> https://github.com/ardbiesheuvel/X86EmulatorPkg/tree/up
> stream-v4
> >
> > This also allows us to get rid of the special
> treatment of EBC images in
> > core code. Instead, the EbcDxe driver is augmented
> with an implementation
> > of the EDK2 PE/COFF image emulator protocol so that
> internal knowledge of
> > how EBC is implemented (I-cache flushing, thunks) is
> removed from the DXE
> > core.
> >
> > Changes since v4:
> > - Fix an issue in the protocol notify handler pointed
> out by Mike Kinney (#2)
> >
> > Changes since v3:
> > - Simplify the handling of option ROMs and Driver####
> images, by simply
> >   deferring to the LoadImage() boot service to decide
> whether an image
> >   can be supported or not - this removes some
> redundant checks from the
> >   BDS layer and the PCI bus driver.
> > - Move the machine type supported by the emulator
> into the protocol struct,
> >   so we can optimize away calls into the emulator for
> each image loaded.
> >   Instead, the LoadImage() code will only invoke the
> IsSupported() method for
> >   images that are known to have a matching machine
> type.
> >
> > Note that I have considered, but ultimately dismissed
> the suggestion to
> > register and unregister emulators via a new protocol.
> The main issue is
> > that registering and unregistering structs containing
> sets of function
> > pointers is awfully similar to managing a protocol
> database, and we already
> > have the code to do that in EDK2.
> >
> > So instead, I have removed all the code that iterates
> over a handle buffer
> > of emu protocols and invokes each one to see if it
> will support the image.
> > Instead, this is all done by CoreLoadImage().
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > - incorporate feedback from Andrew Fish (delivered in
> person):
> >   * pass a device path into the IsImageSupported()
> protocol method so that an
> >     implementation can blacklist or whitelist certain
> devices, or implement
> >     other policies that depend on the device where
> the driver originated
> >   * allow the emulator to supersede the native
> loading of the image - this
> >     permits things like X86 on X86 emulators for
> security sandboxing or debug
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - subsume the EBC handling into the EDK2 emulator
> protocol and abstract
> >   away from EBC specifics in core code.
> > - allow multiple emulator implementations to co-exist
> > - incorporate Star's review feedback
> >
> 
> 
> In order not to spam everyone with another revision
> within a couple of
> hours, I have applied the feedback from Mike for the VS
> build errors
> and pushed the result here:
> 
> https://github.com/ardbiesheuvel/edk2/pull/new/pecoff-
> emu-v5+
> 
> in case the MdeModulePkg maintainers want to pull the
> code and test it
> during review.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#38973): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/38973
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31034147/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to