Hao, Will the CSM duplication cause any code change that may impact CSM functionality? If no, how about firstly duplicate them first?
David, Will this approach work for you? Thanks, Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 9:19 AM > To: David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org>; Justen, Jordan L > <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io > Cc: Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Ard > Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; Phillips, D Scott > <d.scott.phill...@intel.com> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/6] Ovmf: Drop IntelFramework[Module]Pkg > dependency > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wu, Hao A > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 4:06 PM > > To: 'David Woodhouse'; Justen, Jordan L; devel@edk2.groups.io > > Cc: Ni, Ray; Laszlo Ersek; Ard Biesheuvel; Phillips, D Scott > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/6] Ovmf: Drop IntelFramework[Module]Pkg > > dependency > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dw...@infradead.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 4:01 PM > > > To: Wu, Hao A; Justen, Jordan L; devel@edk2.groups.io > > > Cc: Ni, Ray; Laszlo Ersek; Ard Biesheuvel; Phillips, D Scott > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Ovmf: Drop IntelFramework[Module]Pkg > > > dependency > > > > > > On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 07:49 +0000, Wu, Hao A wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > For the series: > > > > [PATCH v2 00/10] Duplicate required CSM components for OVMF > > > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41385 > > > > > > > > I sent it out on May 27th, and did not receive a confirmation from > > > > David for about 2 weeks. I think maybe the CSM support on OVMF is > > > > no longer cared, and thus I sent another series today to drop such > support: > > > > [PATCH v1 0/2] OVMF: Drop CSM support > > > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42142 > > > > > > > > Please help to provide some feedbacks/confirmation on what should > > > > I do > > > for > > > > the next step. (This task actually blocks our proposal to remove > > > > IntelFramework[Module]Pkg from edk2.) > > > > > > > > > Apologies for the delay. It wasn't clear that the first series was > > > actually tested by booting with a CSM, and I was reluctant to ack it > > > without knowing that it didn't cause a regression. > > > > Agree, I understand that. > > > > > > > > This is, of course, complicated by the fact that I can't actually > > > get a CSM boot to complete at the moment. But it gets a long way > > > into the boot process before something goes wrong, so confirmation > > > that it still gets at least that far with your 'Duplicate required CSM > components' > > > series would be good. > > > > > > Is there a git tree I can pull from? I seem to recall that last time > > > I spent serious time working on OVMF, life was horribly complicated > > > by CRLF line endings, and it was extremely painful to just apply > > > patches from email... is that still the case? > > > > Yes, you can get the first series at: > > https://github.com/hwu25/edk2/commits/ovmf_csm_v2 > > Hello David, > > May I know how long will it take for your verification and acknowledging the > series that duplicate the required CSM modules under OvmfPkg? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards, > Hao Wu > > > > > Best Regards, > > Hao Wu > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#42238): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42238 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32011839/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-