Sorry. I forgot amend it to the commit. Ill fix it.

Sorry Again,
John

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:52 AM
>To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Lofgren, John E <john.e.lofg...@intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch V3] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandlerLib: Fix
>split lock
>
>On 09/18/19 00:49, John E Lofgren wrote:
>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2150
>> V3 changes:
>> change to mov instruction (non locking instuction) instead of xchg to
>> simplify design.
>
>I think something's wrong -- the v3 update described above isn't actually
>implemented in the patch (it continues using XCHG, rather than MOV).
>
>Thanks
>Laszlo
>
>>
>> V2 changes:
>> Add xchg 16 bit instructions to handle sgdt and sidt base
>> 63:48 bits and 47:32 bits.
>> Add comment to explain why xchg 64bit isnt being used
>>
>> Split lock happens when a locking instruction is used on mis-aligned
>> data that crosses two cachelines. If close source platform enables
>> Alignment Check Exception(#AC), They can hit a double fault due to
>> split lock being in CpuExceptionHandlerLib.
>>
>> sigt and sgdt saves 10 bytes to memory, 8 bytes is base and 2 bytes is limit.
>> The data is mis-aligned, can cross two cacheline, and a xchg
>> instruction(locking instuction) is being utilize.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John E Lofgren <john.e.lofg...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>>
>UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLib/X64/ExceptionHandlerAsm.nas
>m
>> | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
>>
>a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLib/X64/ExceptionHandlerAsm.na
>> sm
>>
>b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLib/X64/ExceptionHandlerAsm.na
>> sm
>> index 4db1a09f28..7b7642b290 100644
>> ---
>>
>a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLib/X64/ExceptionHandlerAsm.na
>> sm
>> +++
>b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLib/X64/ExceptionHandlerAs
>> +++ m.nasm
>> @@ -180,21 +180,29 @@ HasErrorCode:
>>      push    qword [rbp + 24]
>>
>>  ;; UINT64  Gdtr[2], Idtr[2];
>> +    ; sidt and sgdt saves 10 bytes to memory, 8 bytes = base and 2 bytes =
>limit.
>> +    ; To avoid #AC split lock when separating base and limit into their
>> +    ; own separate 64 bit memory, we can’t use 64 bit xchg since base 
>> [63:48]
>bits
>> +    ; may cross the cache line.
>>      xor     rax, rax
>>      push    rax
>>      push    rax
>>      sidt    [rsp]
>> -    xchg    rax, [rsp + 2]
>> -    xchg    rax, [rsp]
>> -    xchg    rax, [rsp + 8]
>> +    xchg    eax, [rsp + 2]
>> +    xchg    eax, [rsp]
>> +    xchg    eax, [rsp + 8]
>> +    xchg     ax, [rsp + 6]
>> +    xchg     ax, [rsp + 4]
>>
>>      xor     rax, rax
>>      push    rax
>>      push    rax
>>      sgdt    [rsp]
>> -    xchg    rax, [rsp + 2]
>> -    xchg    rax, [rsp]
>> -    xchg    rax, [rsp + 8]
>> +    xchg    eax, [rsp + 2]
>> +    xchg    eax, [rsp]
>> +    xchg    eax, [rsp + 8]
>> +    xchg     ax, [rsp + 6]
>> +    xchg     ax, [rsp + 4]
>>
>>  ;; UINT64  Ldtr, Tr;
>>      xor     rax, rax
>>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#47483): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47483
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34181976/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to