I have no other comments. Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <[email protected]>

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wu, Hao A
>Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2019 3:31 PM
>To: [email protected]; Zurcher, Christopher J
><[email protected]>; Gao, Liming <[email protected]>
>Cc: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; Yao, Jiewen
><[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v8 0/4] Add SCSI Support for Storage
>Security Command Protocol
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> Zurcher, Christopher J
>> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 10:20 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D; Yao, Jiewen; Wang, Jian J; Gao, Liming; Wu, Hao A
>> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v8 0/4] Add SCSI Support for Storage Security
>> Command Protocol
>>
>> BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1546
>>
>> V8 changes:
>> Align Inc512 definition in UefiScsiLib.h with that in UefiScsiLib.c.
>>
>> V7 changes:
>> Changed Inc512 behavior to always take DataLength as bytes, and divide
>> by 512 only in the CDB.
>>
>> V6 changes:
>> Restore EFI_SCSI_TYPE defines for ASC IT8 devices. Revert
>EFI_SCSI_IO_TYPE
>> changes in Protocol\ScsiIo.h. Add INC_512 parameter for SecurityProtocol
>> In/Out commands in UefiScsiLib. Change UINT32 args to UINTN to match the
>> definitions for Storage Security Command Protocol.
>>
>> V5 changes:
>> Split MdeModulePkg changes into separate patches. Add ReinstallProtocol
>> calls for StorageSecurityCommand Protocol. Restore original MediaPresent
>> and ReadCapacity behavior, with new implementation for WLUN type media.
>> Clear temporary aligned buffers before freeing them.
>>
>> V4 changes:
>> Add SSC Protocol in addition to BlockIo instead of in place of BlockIo.
>> Add error handling for (BlockSize == 0) in Read and WriteBlocks commands
>> to handle partitions that do not support ReadCapacity().
>>
>> V3 changes:
>> Initialize AlignedBuffer variable in ScsiDiskReceiveData and
>> ScsiDiskSendData functions. Remove redundant input validation and debug
>> message in ScsiDiskSendData.
>>
>> V2 changes:
>> Split the patch into separate commits for separate packages.
>>
>> To support RPMB access on UFS devices, support must be added to
>> the ScsiDiskDxe driver for the Storage Security Command Protocol.
>>
>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Jiewen Yao <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Jian J Wang <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Liming Gao <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Hao A Wu <[email protected]>
>>
>> Christopher J Zurcher (4):
>>   MdePkg: Implement SCSI commands for Security Protocol In/Out
>
>
>For patch 1,
>Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <[email protected]>
>
>Hello Liming,
>Do you have additional comment on the patch?
>
>
>>   MdeModulePkg/UfsPassThruDxe: Check for RPMB W-LUN (SecurityLun)
>>   MdeModulePkg/ScsiBusDxe: Clean up Peripheral Type check
>>   MdeModulePkg/ScsiDiskDxe: Support Storage Security Command Protocol
>
>
>Since the MdeModulePkg part is the same with V6 series, thus:
>Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <[email protected]>
>
>Best Regards,
>Hao Wu
>
>
>>
>>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Scsi/ScsiDiskDxe/ScsiDiskDxe.inf |   3 +-
>>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Scsi/ScsiDiskDxe/ScsiDisk.h      | 171 +++++-
>>  MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Scsi.h            |  48 +-
>>  MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiScsiLib.h              | 130 ++++-
>>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Scsi/ScsiBusDxe/ScsiBus.c        |   5 +-
>>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Scsi/ScsiDiskDxe/ScsiDisk.c      | 616
>> +++++++++++++++++++-
>>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ufs/UfsPassThruDxe/UfsPassThru.c |  17 +-
>>  MdePkg/Library/UefiScsiLib/UefiScsiLib.c          | 229 +++++++-
>>  8 files changed, 1181 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.16.2.windows.1
>>
>>
>> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#48267): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/48267
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34306978/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to