Hi Leif,

Yes, that's a Reviewed-by. 

Thanks. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leif Lindholm <l...@nuviainc.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 7:16 PM
> To: Loh, Tien Hock <tien.hock....@intel.com>
> Cc: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.ban...@nxp.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheu...@arm.com>; Gaurav Jain <gaurav.j...@nxp.com>; Meenakshi
> Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Haojian
> Zhuang <haojian.zhu...@linaro.org>; Varun Sethi <v.se...@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] EmbeddedPkg/MmcDxe: Added MaxBlock Transfer
> Limit 65535 in R/W.
> 
> Hi Tien Hock,
> 
> Can I take that as a Reviewed-by:?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Leif
> 
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:17:18 +0000, Loh, Tien Hock wrote:
> > Hi Ard,
> >
> > I have checked the patch and it looks good.
> >
> > However, I can no longer test the patch as the new DwMmc driver no longer
> uses the protocol.
> > Sorry for the delay, I initially thought I can test it until I investigated 
> > further
> today.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.ban...@nxp.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 2:19 PM
> > > To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@arm.com>; Leif Lindholm
> > > <l...@nuviainc.com>; Gaurav Jain <gaurav.j...@nxp.com>; Meenakshi
> > > Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>
> > > Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Haojian Zhuang
> > > <haojian.zhu...@linaro.org>; Loh, Tien Hock
> > > <tien.hock....@intel.com>; Varun Sethi <v.se...@nxp.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] EmbeddedPkg/MmcDxe: Added MaxBlock
> Transfer
> > > Limit 65535 in R/W.
> > >
> > > + Meenakshi
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@arm.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 7:42 PM
> > > > To: Leif Lindholm <l...@nuviainc.com>; Gaurav Jain
> > > > <gaurav.j...@nxp.com>
> > > > Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.ban...@nxp.com>;
> > > > Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhu...@linaro.org>; Loh, Tien Hock
> > > > <tien.hock....@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] EmbeddedPkg/MmcDxe: Added MaxBlock
> > > > Transfer Limit 65535 in R/W.
> > > >
> > > > On 4/6/20 4:08 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > > > > Hi Gaurav,
> > > > >
> > > > > Haojian, Tien Hock - can you help review/test this change?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Leif
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 14:54:07 +0530, Gaurav Jain wrote:
> > > > >> Moved BlockCount calculation below BufferSize Validation checks.
> > > > >> First Ensure Buffersize is Not Zero and multiple of Media BlockSize.
> > > > >> then calculate BlockCount and perform Block checks.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Corrected BlockCount calculation, as BufferSize is multiple of
> > > > >> BlockSize, So adding (BlockSize-1) bytes to BufferSize and then
> > > > >> divide by BlockSize will have no impact on BlockCount.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Reading Large Images from MMC causes errors.
> > > > >> As per SD Host Controller Spec version 4.20, Restriction of
> > > > >> 16-bit Block Count transfer is 65535.
> > > > >> Max block transfer limit in single cmd is 65535 blocks.
> > > > >> Added Max Block check that can be processed is 0xFFFF.
> > > > >> then Update BlockCount on the basis of MaxBlock.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Jain <gaurav.j...@nxp.com>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello Gaurav,
> > > >
> > > > Could you please elaborate on the underlying need for this change?
> > > > If you are considering using this driver for future NXP platforms,
> > > > I should point out that this legacy driver is only kept around for
> > > > existing users, and new users should use the driver stack in
> > > > MdeModulePkg, which is based on the UEFI spec.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ard.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#58349): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/58349
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/72744881/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to