From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Brian J. Johnson Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2020 1:29 AM To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Bi, Dandan <dandan...@intel.com>; r...@edk2.groups.io Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.w...@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; Tan, Ming <ming....@intel.com> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
On 6/18/20 2:01 AM, Dandan Bi wrote: Hi All, REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2816 We plan to separate two kinds of NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/.../ StatusCodeHandlerPei/RuntimeDxe/Smm modules. The benefit we want to gain from this separation is to 1) make the code clear and easy to maintain, 2) make platform flexible to choose any handler library they need, and it also can reduce image size since the unused handlers can be excluded. If you have any concern or comments for this separation, please let me know. We plan to add new separated NULL class library MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib and SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib with different phase implementation into MdeModulePkg\Library\ directory. The main tree structure may like below: MdeModulePkg\Library |------MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib |------|------ PeiMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf |------|------ RuntimeDxeMemoryStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf |------|------ SmmMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf |------SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib |------|------ PeiSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf |------|------ RuntimeDxeSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf |------|------ SmmSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf We will update existing platform use cases in edk2 and edk2-platform repo to cover the new NULL class library to make sure this change doesn't impact any platform. After this separation, StatusCodeHandler module usage will like below, and it's also very flexible for platform to cover more handler libraries to meet their requirements. MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/Pei/StatusCodeHandlerPei.inf { <LibraryClasses> NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib/PeiMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib/PeiSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf ... } MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/RuntimeDxe/StatusCodeHandlerRuntimeDxe.inf { <LibraryClasses> NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib/RuntimeDxeMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib/RuntimeDxeSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf ... } MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/Smm/StatusCodeHandlerSmm.inf { <LibraryClasses> NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib/SmmMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib/SmmSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf ... } Thanks, Dandan Dandan, We'll have a lot of layers of indirection.... The ReportStatusCodeRouter modules will call one or more StatusCodeHandlerModules, and the standard StatusCodeHandler modules will call multiple StatusCodeHandlerLib libraries. How about adding StatusCodeHandlerLib support directly to the ReportStatusCodeRouter modules? Then platforms could omit the StatusCodeHandler modules if they're only using the open-source code. That sounds like less overhead since fewer modules would be needed Hi Brain, You are right. Current design truly has a lot of layers. The ReportStatusCodeRouter module provides the register logic and maintain the registered status code handlers. Now the platform may have more than one of drivers used to register the status code handler. This RFC used to resolve the platform has more than one status code handler drivers' issue. We expect the platform only need one wrapper driver in MdeModulePkg to let the status code handler library to register its handler on it. Thanks, Eric Thanks, -- Brian J. Johnson Enterprise X86 Lab Hewlett Packard Enterprise hpe.com<3D%22hpe.com%22> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#61543): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/61543 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/74953841/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
