Hi Mike,

I agree that's a good way to meet the requirement. Maintaining the two APIs would just be a transient state (i.e. on order of days) to update edk2-platforms users and then we could remove the old API, right?

Our main concern was maintaining the two APIs side-by-side long term.

Thanks,
Michael

On 8/28/2020 12:25 PM, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
Hi Michael,

There are implementations of FMpDeviceLib in edk2-platforms.  So the challenge 
is how
to prepare a set of patch series to edk2 and edk2-platforms where there are no
intermediate states that break builds.  Adding new APIs and later removing the
old APIs is one way to meet this requirement.  Do you have other ideas?

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael Kubacki
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 12:21 PM
To: Sean Brogan <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kinney, Michael D 
<[email protected]>
Cc: Gao, Liming <[email protected]>; Jiang, Guomin <[email protected]>; Xu, 
Wei6 <[email protected]>; Liu, Zhiguang
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] Extend Last Attempt Status Usage

Hi Mike,

We've stated a few reasons we prefer to change the library API now. Do
you find that acceptable for v4?

Thanks,
Michael

On 8/21/2020 2:25 PM, Michael Kubacki wrote:
Hi Sean,

Thanks for the feedback.

#1 - I will include both suggestions in v4.

Thanks,
Michael

On 8/20/2020 7:37 PM, Sean Brogan wrote:
Michael,

#1
I would suggest calling out the sub-range

0x10A0 | 0x17FF  -- Free for Library Implementations of FmpDevicePkg

I also might suggest splitting FmpDependencyLib and
FmpDependencyCheckLib ranges just to show a consistent pattern of how
each library instance within FmpDevicePkg gets a defined range.


#2
Given that edk2 does not have any real FmpDeviceLibs (only instance is
FmpDevicePkg\Library\FmpDeviceLibNull\FmpDeviceLibNull.inf).  Now is
the best time to make a breaking change. It is very common for
downstream code repositories to integrate edk2 and be forced to make
changes associated with the new integration.  To me this is
preferred.  A build break is easy to resolve. When functionality
changes or new features are added but don't cause a break this is more
difficult to integrate correctly.  Not only that, it leads to nearly
everyone ignoring the change.  There is no need for this change to be
a multi-year integration or cause extra development of shims and
translation functions.  The API change is pretty easy.  The
implementation can choose to to avoid the new ranges and just set the
value to 1 (FMP unknown error).  This would match the behavior of
today.  Obviously i believe it would better to take the extra time to
create unique ranges for each of your libs.  Also note that if anyone
is doing third party binary integration this is not a breaking
change.  This only breaks for those doing a src build.

Thanks
Sean






On 8/20/2020 6:25 PM, Michael Kubacki wrote:
Hi Mike,

1) Yes, we can certainly leave more of the unsuccessful vendor range
available for future expansion. I believe we can also reduce the FMP
reserved range. How about a length of 0x800 for both?

The ranges would then be defined as follows:

START     | END       | Usage
------------------------------------------------------------------|
0x1000    | 0x17FF    | FmpDevicePkg                              |
     0x1000 |    0x107F | FmpDxe driver                             |
     0x1080 |    0x109F | FMP dependencies (e.g. FmpDependencyLib)  |
0x1800    | 0x1FFF    | FmpDeviceLib instances implementation     |
0x2000    | 0x3FFF    | Unused. Available for future expansion.   |

Also, I don't see a problem with removing the length defines and
directly specifying min/max defines for each range.

2.) I understand the compatibility concern but as you noted it is
cleaner to maintain a single interface. I believe making the
transition to the new API will only become more difficult in the
future as it may go unnoticed resulting in implementations that don't
implement support for this capability leading to an increasing amount
of future effort to do work that could be done now. Perhaps we could
get thoughts from others as well?

3.) I will update these to return back an expected value.

Thanks,
Michael

On 8/19/2020 7:57 PM, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
Hi Michael,

A couple a couple general questions:

1) I see the entire range from 0x2000-0x3FFF is reserved for
FmpDeviceLib.  If we
     every add more device/platform specific libs for FMP, there are
no ranges available.
     Should we limit the FmpDeviceLib to a smaller range to support
future expansion?

     Also, the style of LastAttemptStatus.h with extra defines for
the length of
     each range is hard to read, and I do not think there are any
consumers of the
     length defines from this public include file.  Since there are
really only 3
     defined ranges, couldn't this be simplified to min/max defines
for each range
     for a total of 6 #defines.  I do not expect ranges (once
defined) to change in
     length, and the most that might happen in the future is adding
new ranges for
     new lib classes in the unused ranges.

2) This series makes non-backwards compatible changes to some of the
lib classes.
     I agree this is the cleanest way to add support for the vendor
specific
     last attempt status.  It does mean that existing implementations
will have
     to update their lib implementations to be compatible with this
new version.
     I would be slightly cleaner to introduce new APIs with support
for the
     vendor specific last attempt status codes.  Then update all libs
to produce
     both the existing APIs and the new APIs (The old APIs can call
the new APIs).
     Then update FmpDxe to use the new APIs.  This would be 3 patch
series.
     If FmpDxe never calls the old APIs, then we could (at a future
date)
     delete the old APIs from the lib class and the lib
implementations could
     remove the old API that calls the new API.

3) The following APIs in the Null implementations have OUT params.
     Should these OUT params be set to an expected value?

       CheckFmpDependency()
       FmpDeviceGetImage()
       FmpDeviceSetImage()

Thanks,

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 2:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Gao, Liming <[email protected]>; Kinney, Michael D
<[email protected]>; Jiang, Guomin
<[email protected]>; Xu,
Wei6 <[email protected]>; Liu, Zhiguang <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] Extend Last Attempt Status Usage

From: Michael Kubacki <[email protected]>

REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2802

This patch series adds more granularity to Last Attempt Status
codes reported during FMP check image and set image operations
that greatly improve precision of the status codes.

The unsuccessful vendor range (0x1000 - 0x4000) was introduced
in UEFI Specification 2.8. At a high-level, two subranges are
defined within that range in this patch series:
    1. The FMP Reserved range - reserved for components implemented
       in FmpDevicePkg.
    2. The FMP Device Library Reserved range - reserved for
       FmpDeviceLib instance-specific usage.

The ranges are described in a public header file LastAttemptStatus.h
while the specific codes used within FmpDevicePkg implementation
are defined in a private header file FmpLastAttemptStatus.h.

FmpDeviceLib instances should use the range definition from the
public header file to define Last Attempt Status codes local to
their library instance.

Of note, there's multiple approaches to assigning private status
codes in the FMP Reserved range. For example, individual components
could define their last attempt status codes locally with the
range allocated to the component defined in a package-wide private
header file. However, one goal of the granularity being introduced
is to provide straightforward traceability to an error source.

For that reason, it was chosen to define a constant set of codes at
the package level in FmpLastAttemptStatus.h. For example, if a new
FmpDependencyLib instance is added, it would not be able to reassign
status code values in the pre-existing FMP Dependency range; it
would reuse codes for the same error source and be able to add new
codes onto the range for its usage. I wanted to highlight this for
any feedback.

V3 changes:
    1. Enhanced range definitions in LastAttemptStatus.h with more
       completeness providing length, min, and max values.
    2. Moved the actual Last Attempt Status code assignments to a
       private header file PrivateInclude/FmpLastAttemptStatus.h.
    3. Changed the value of
       LAST_ATTEMPT_STATUS_ERROR_UNSUCCESSFUL_VENDOR_RANGE_MAX
       to 0x3FFF instead of 0x4000 even though 0x4000 is defined in
       the UEFI specification. The length is 0x4000 but the max
       allowed value should be 0x3FFF. This change was made now to
       prevent implementation compatibility issues in the future.
    4. Included "DEVICE" in the following macro name to clearly
       associate it with the FmpDeviceLib library class:
       LAST_ATTEMPT_STATUS_DEVICE_LIBRARY_ERROR_xxx
    5. Included a map to help the reader better visualize the range
       definitions in LastAttemptStatus.h.
    6. Included additional documentation describing the enum in
       FmpLastAttemptStatus.h. An explicit statement stating that new
       codes should be added onto the end of ranges to preserve the
       values was added.
    7. Simplified error handling logic in FmpDxe for FmpDeviceLib
       calls that return Last Attempt Status.
    8. V2 had a single memory allocation failure code used for
       different memory allocations in CheckFmpDependency () in
       FmpDependencyLib. Each potential allocation failure was
       assigned a unique code.

V2 changes:
    1. Consolidate all previous incremental updates to
       LastAttemptStatus.h into one patch (patch 2)
    2. Move LastAttemptStatus.h from Include to PrivateInclude
    3. Correct patch 1 subject from "FmpDevicePkg" to "MdePkg"

Cc: Liming Gao <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]>
Cc: Guomin Jiang <[email protected]>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhiguang Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <[email protected]>

Michael Kubacki (6):
    MdePkg/SystemResourceTable.h: Add vendor range values
    FmpDevicePkg: Add Last Attempt Status header files
    FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe: Add check image path Last Attempt Status
      capability
    FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe: Improve set image path Last Attempt Status
      granularity
    FmpDevicePkg: Add Last Attempt Status support to dependency libs
    FmpDevicePkg/FmpDeviceLib: Add Last Attempt Status to Check/Set API

FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.c | 176 +++++++++++++++++---
FmpDevicePkg/Library/FmpDependencyCheckLib/FmpDependencyCheckLib.c
|  39 +++--
FmpDevicePkg/Library/FmpDependencyCheckLibNull/FmpDependencyCheckLibNull.c
|   9 +-
FmpDevicePkg/Library/FmpDependencyLib/FmpDependencyLib.c |  96
+++++++++--
FmpDevicePkg/Library/FmpDeviceLibNull/FmpDeviceLib.c |  48 ++++--
FmpDevicePkg/Test/UnitTest/Library/FmpDependencyLib/EvaluateDependencyUnitTest.c
|   7 +-
FmpDevicePkg/FmpDxe/FmpDxe.h |   4 +-
FmpDevicePkg/Include/LastAttemptStatus.h |  96 +++++++++++
FmpDevicePkg/Include/Library/FmpDependencyCheckLib.h |   8 +-
FmpDevicePkg/Include/Library/FmpDependencyLib.h |  44 +++--
FmpDevicePkg/Include/Library/FmpDeviceLib.h |  48 ++++--
FmpDevicePkg/PrivateInclude/FmpLastAttemptStatus.h |  80 +++++++++
MdePkg/Include/Guid/SystemResourceTable.h |  13 ++
   13 files changed, 575 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
   create mode 100644 FmpDevicePkg/Include/LastAttemptStatus.h
   create mode 100644
FmpDevicePkg/PrivateInclude/FmpLastAttemptStatus.h

--
2.28.0.windows.1








-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#64918): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/64918
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76274480/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to