Hi Ray, I was suggested not to rename the file for review easiness and git history concern during v2 patch. Thread here: Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] UefiCpuPkg: CpuIo2Smm: Support of CpuIo driver under StandaloneMm (groups.io)<https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/69857>
Please let me know if you still recommend renaming the files. If so, would you suggest ```CpuIo2Smm.c/h --> CpuIo2Mm.c/h # remove the "S"``` to be a separate patch between gSmst change and adding Standalone MM instance? Thanks in advance. Regards, Kun From: Ni, Ray<mailto:ray...@intel.com> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 20:17 To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; ku...@outlook.com<mailto:ku...@outlook.com> Cc: Dong, Eric<mailto:eric.d...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul1<mailto:rahul1.ku...@intel.com> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 17/18] UefiCpuPkg: CpuIo2Smm: Support of CpuIo driver under StandaloneMm > > UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2Smm.c | 9 ++---- > UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2StandaloneMm.c | 32 > ++++++++++++++++++++ > UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2TraditionalMm.c | 32 > ++++++++++++++++++++ > UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2Smm.h | 12 ++++++++ > UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/CpuIo2Smm.inf | 3 +- > UefiCpuPkg/CpuIo2Smm/{CpuIo2Smm.inf => CpuIo2StandaloneMm.inf} | 18 > +++++------ > UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dsc | 5 +++ How about do the file name change as below? CpuIo2Smm.c/h --> CpuIo2Mm.c/h # remove the "S" CpuIo2TraditionalMm.c -> CpuIo2Smm.c # Traditional MM equals to SMM. It also matches to CpuIo2Smm.inf. CpuIo2StandaloneMm.c/inf # looks good to me. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#70665): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/70665 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/79688598/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
