> +
> +  //
> +  // The order matters when packing all applied microcode patches to a 
> single binary blob.
> +  // Therefore it is a must to do sorting before packing.
> +  // NOTE: We assumed that the order of address of every microcode patch in 
> RAM is the same
> +  // with the order of those in the Microcode Firmware Volume in FLASH. If 
> any future updates
> +  // made this assumption untenable, then needs a new solution to measure 
> microcode patches.
> +  //

Can you explain the above comments?
If you only measure the microcode which will be applied to CPU, why do you care 
about the order?


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#84775): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/84775
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/87706159/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to