Hi,
> As the first step CC_GUEST_TYPE is defined in this patch. In the
> next patch GUEST_TYPE will be deleted. This is to make sure the
> bisect work correctly.
Hmm, what exactly went wrong? Splitting into two patches looks
pointless. If the change is too big for an all-in-one patch typical
bisectable splitting would be:
(1) add CC_GUEST_TYPE
(2) multiple patches switching code from GUEST_TYPE to CC_GUEST_TYPE
(for example one patch per Pkg).
(3) remove GUEST_TYPE
> +//
> +// Confidential computing guest type
> +//
> +typedef enum {
> + CCGuestTypeNonEncrypted = 0,
> + CCGuestTypeAmdSev,
> + CCGuestTypeIntelTdx,
> +} CC_GUEST_TYPE;
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
take care,
Gerd
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#89055): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/89055
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/90516972/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
