Hello Michael, On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 00:28, Michael Kubacki <mikub...@linux.microsoft.com> wrote: > > Hello Package Maintainers & Reviewers, > > Is it intentional that these packages do not have a .ci.yaml file? > > 1. EmbeddedPkg > 2. IntelFsp2Pkg > 3. IntelFsp2WrapperPkg > 4. SignedCapsulePkg > 5. SourceLevelDebugPkg > > This impacts CI running against these packages. >
I'm not sure what you mean with 'intentional'. Originally, no packages had .ci.yaml files, and over time, they were contributed for most of the packages. If anyone wants to contribute .ci.yaml files for these packages as well, I would not object, so I guess it is not intentional in that sense, as far as I am concerned. But if the policy today is that all packages must have .ci.yaml files, I'm not sure who is on the hook to realize that. -- Ard. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#92034): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92034 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/92759801/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
