On 1/12/23 00:08, Dionna Glaze via groups.io wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 8:55 AM Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dionna,
>>
>> https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Development-Process
>>
>> I think you are at step 13.  If you have not done so already, please update 
>> the
>> commit messages with all the Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags and make sure your
>> branch is rebased against the latest edk2/master and update the PR with that
>> content and verify that all EDK II CI checks pass.
>>
>> At that point, it is the responsibility of the EDK II Maintainers to review
>> the final state of the PR and set the "push" label if everything looks 
>> correct.
>>
>> At this moment, we are in Soft Freeze and will be in Hard Freeze for the next
>> 2 weeks.  If this is considered critical for the stable tag release, then
>> please send a request to Liming with justification for stable tag.  
>> Otherwise,
>> it will be merged after the stable tag release.
>>
>> https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Planning
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mike
>>
> 
> Hi Mike, my PR was closed without comment
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/3623 so I rebased and created a
> new PR after the holidays and hard freeze. I hope this isn't
> considered bad practice https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/3885
> 

I closed the PR -- similarly to how I manually closed 400+ stale PRs
then -- because it was not a maintainer-submitted PR with the "push"
label set. In other words, it was just a personal build, for triggering
a CI run.

And, in fact regardlessly of whether it was a "push"-labeled maintainer
PR or just a personal PR, the PR was almost two months old. Clearly
stale and abandoned -- per edk2 contribution workflow, anyway.

Please excuse me for not explaining this in a comment on the PR, but (as
I said above) I closed 400+ stale PRs manually within 10-15 minutes on
the github.com WebUI. The necessary muscle memory training didn't allow
for individual comments.

(I actually tried scripting the mass-closure at first, with the "gh"
utility, but something in the github.com data model was broken, and the
server wouldn't allow me to close those PRs with the utility, even
though I had authenticated the utility under my account, with a complete
set of scopes -- see my report at
<https://github.com/cli/cli/discussions/6814>.)

Regarding your new PR: it's again good for a personal CI run only. If it
completes fine, please post the patches to the mailing list, using
git-send-email.

(From browsing recent list traffic, it seems that your colleague Moritz
Fischer <mori...@google.com> has posted patches like that to the list;
please consider consulting with Moritz regarding the git setup (SMTP
server etc) withing Google. Cc'ing Moritz now.)

When sending the patches like that, please CC the maintainers and
reviewers that are supposed to review them. Once they are happy with the
series, one of them will submit a PR with them, and set the "push" label
on the PR. When the CI run succeeds, the mergify bot will merge *that*
PR automatically.

Laszlo



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#98361): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/98361
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/94894288/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to