On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:46:34AM +0000, Yao, Jiewen wrote: > Hi Dionna > I think I understand your intention. > I believe we need OS side and UEFI standard sign-off for this > *BZ3987_MEMORY_ACCEPTANCE_PROTOCOL*, because OS is the consumer, right? > If so, I suggest you maintain the work in a edk2-stage area for > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-staging. > > EDKII main branch is for production. MdePkg can only include the API > definition approved by UEFI standard. > EDK2 staging is a place for POC / collaboration. That is why I think edk2 > staging is more proper place for this feature. > > Without OS and UEFI standard sign-off, I don't think this > BZ3987_MEMORY_ACCEPTANCE_PROTOCOL can be integrated to EDKII main branch, > especially in MdePkg/Include/Protocol/MemoryAcceptance.h.
Ok. Reading through the bug (comment 53) it looks like Intel's take on this is that it will simply not be needed long-term. How about adding it to OvmfPkg/Include/Protocol/MemoryAcceptance.h then? It surely will be very useful short-term. If it turns out that lazy accept support indeed becomes a standard feature we might drop this in 3-5 years. Or promote it to MdePkg should that not be the case. take care, Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#98451): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/98451 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/96236145/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
