Hi Ard, Thank you! Is "1/4" a mistake or did I miss the other 3? :) Comments inline.
> On 17. Feb 2023, at 12:12, Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org> wrote: > > The Unicode collation protocols, however, are different: loading the > driver will fail if neither of those are present. So they are not > TO_START protocols, and they need to be mentioned in the DEPEX so that > the DXE core will not dispatch the driver before the producers of the > prerequisite protocols have been dispatched. Also, mark them as > SOMETIMES_CONSUMES, as only one of the two is required. Right. FatPkg solves this by probing for the protocol in Start() [1], which should guarantee that all entry points have been executed first, right? I'd prefer a universal and consistent solution to the issue and this looks fine, honestly. [1] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/02fcfdce1e5ce86f1951191883e7e30de5aa08be/FatPkg/EnhancedFatDxe/Fat.c#L381 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/02fcfdce1e5ce86f1951191883e7e30de5aa08be/FatPkg/EnhancedFatDxe/Fat.inf#L19 > - MODULE_TYPE = UEFI_DRIVER > + MODULE_TYPE = DXE_DRIVER Is it not unidiomatic to use the UEFI Driver Binding model (UEFI) in a DXE driver (UEFI PI)? > +[Depex] > + gEfiUnicodeCollationProtocolGuid OR gEfiUnicodeCollation2ProtocolGuid Hmm, this will have the side effect that Ext4Dxe may load before (some of) the architectural protocols, right (modulo implicit dependencies via the UC protocols)? This would need some careful analysis, or we need to add all of the architectural protocols to preserve the old behaviour. Best regards, Marvin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#100320): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/100320 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97025926/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
