On 2023-11-02 10:19, PierreGondois wrote:
+/// SCMI Message Ids for the Performance Protocol.
+typedef enum {
+ ScmiMessageIdPerformanceDomainAttributes = 0x3,
+ ScmiMessageIdPerformanceDescribeLevels = 0x4,
+ ScmiMessageIdPerformanceLimitsSet = 0x5,
+ ScmiMessageIdPerformanceLimitsGet = 0x6,
+ ScmiMessageIdPerformanceLevelSet = 0x7,
+ ScmiMessageIdPerformanceLevelGet = 0x8,
+ ScmiMessageIdPerformanceDescribeFastchannel = 0xB,
+} SCMI_MESSAGE_ID_PERFORMANCE;
This struct appears to move in the code at the same time as having an
entry added to it. This seems superficially unmotivated.
However it is also moved to inside the pack(1) block, which makes no
sense for an enum.
Yes right, I will move it out of the pack(1) section.
Thx, with that change:
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <quic_llind...@quicinc.com>
The reason to move the SCMI_MESSAGE_ID_PERFORMANCE definition up in the
file
was that the SCMI_PERFORMANCE_DESCRIBE_FASTCHANNEL interface added in this
patch takes a SCMI_MESSAGE_ID_PERFORMANCE parameter as an argument, so the
enum needs to be defined before.
I can add a comment about this in the commit message.
It doesn't really need to be in the commit message, but it's the kind of
thing that can be helpful to point out below ---.
Regards,
Leif
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110527): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/110527
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102175812/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe:
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/9847357/21656/1706620634/xyzzy
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
