Hi Jiewen, On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 13:41:21 +0000, Yao, Jiewen wrote: > Thanks to let me know the background. > > Please be aware that there is fundamental difference between > dependency in INF and dependency in DSC. > > What we have previously in the ArmPkg in *DSC*. We don’t need add > ArmPkg in yaml. > However, what you try to introduce is ArmPkg in *INF*, e.g. your > patch v5 5/6. Then we have to add ArmPkg in yaml. > > Personally, I don’t think it is a good idea to add ArmPkg to yaml, > because it means that you have to pull ArmPkg when you build > CryptoPkg,. > > As long as what you add is industry standard, it is OK to add to > MdePkg, like what you did in v2. I would like to suggest this > approach.
Ultimately, all of ArmPkg needs to migrate to MdePkg. See https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4121 But this is a BIG task. The reason I asked Pierre to add this functionality in ArmPkg rather than MdePkg is because that is where the existing related discovery code lives. (Think of it as CPUID.) For historical reasons, predating mine and Ard's involvement with edk2, this functionality (as well as other critical Arm functionality) lives in a library called ArmLib, under ArmPkg. For Ia32/X64, all such support lives in BaseLib, under MdePkg. This is why I referred to ArmPkg as an exclave of MdePkg in my original reply to Pierre. And until someone untangles this, it's not realistic to treat ArmPkg as anything else. And I don't think it's fair to expect Pierre to untangle this as part of this series. But I also don't think "Arm architectures need to duplicate their basic support code across multiple packages" is a solution. Regards, Leif > But I would like to have ARM expert to check if those are really ARM > standard, and also have MdePkg owner check if it is acceptable. > > Thank you > Yao, Jiewen > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pierre Gondois <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 8:59 PM > > To: Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Leif Lindholm > > <[email protected]> > > Cc: Li, Yi1 <[email protected]>; Lu, Xiaoyu1 <[email protected]>; Jiang, > > Guomin > > <[email protected]>; Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>; Sami > > Mujawar <[email protected]>; Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.ci.yaml: Allow dependency > > upon ArmPkg > > > > Hello Jiewen, > > > > On 11/21/23 12:27, Yao, Jiewen wrote: > > > Why CryptoPkg needs to depend on ArmPkg? > > > > > > Can we move content to MdePkg? > > > > The OpensslLib needs to discover the native instruction supported by the > > underlying platform before using them. This could also be done through the > > MdePkg as you suggested. The v2 is implemented that way: > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/110953 > > > > Also, as noted by Leif, it seems there is already a dependency over ArmPkg: > > # git grep ArmPkg CryptoPkg/ > > CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.dsc: ArmLib|ArmPkg/Library/ArmLib/ArmBaseLib.inf > > CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.dsc: > > NULL|ArmPkg/Library/CompilerIntrinsicsLib/CompilerIntrinsicsLib.inf > > CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.dsc: > > ArmSoftFloatLib|ArmPkg/Library/ArmSoftFloatLib/ArmSoftFloatLib.inf > > CryptoPkg/CryptoPkgMbedTls.dsc: > > NULL|ArmPkg/Library/CompilerIntrinsicsLib/CompilerIntrinsicsLib.inf > > CryptoPkg/CryptoPkgMbedTls.dsc: > > ArmSoftFloatLib|ArmPkg/Library/ArmSoftFloatLib/ArmSoftFloatLib.inf > > CryptoPkg/CryptoPkgMbedTls.dsc: > > PeiServicesTablePointerLib|ArmPkg/Library/PeiServicesTablePointerLib/PeiServic > > esTablePointerLib.inf > > > > Both solutions suit me (discovering capabilities through ArmPkg or MdePkg), > > I just need to know which one is preferred, > > > > Regards, > > Pierre > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Pierre Gondois <[email protected]> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 4:47 PM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; Li, Yi1 <[email protected]>; Lu, > > Xiaoyu1 > > >> <[email protected]>; Jiang, Guomin <[email protected]>; Leif > > Lindholm > > >> <[email protected]>; Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>; > > >> Sami Mujawar <[email protected]>; Gerd Hoffmann > > >> <[email protected]> > > >> Subject: [PATCH v5 2/6] CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.ci.yaml: Allow dependency > > >> upon > > >> ArmPkg > > >> > > >> Allow dependency upon ArmPkg to pass the dependency Check. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <[email protected]> > > >> --- > > >> CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.ci.yaml | 1 + > > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.ci.yaml b/CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.ci.yaml > > >> index f961d85927c0..3bbb220d3224 100644 > > >> --- a/CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.ci.yaml > > >> +++ b/CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.ci.yaml > > >> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ > > >> }, > > >> > > >> "DependencyCheck": { > > >> > > >> "AcceptableDependencies": [ > > >> > > >> + "ArmPkg/ArmPkg.dec", > > >> > > >> "MdePkg/MdePkg.dec", > > >> > > >> "MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec", > > >> > > >> "CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.dec", > > >> > > >> -- > > >> 2.25.1 > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#111549): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/111549 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102725178/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/9847357/21656/1706620634/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
