Yeah, I think thats a good idea .. could it be configurable in makefile ?
I guess the choice of including smsbox within bearer is a nice thing.
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Frederik Ammitzb�ll wrote:
> It's always the same thread (whether it's smsbox or bearerbox) that gets
> hungry. I believe it to be "thread 1 (gwlib/fdset:poller)" so that might
be
> where the problem is. Any suggestions?
Hm sounds like a problem in fd_set.. so gwlib is a good place to
double-check (conn.c)
I have a solution that stops smsbox eating CPU, but it is a bit
complicated and not yet ready - it is called 'merging bearerbox and
smsbox', which have a list of advantages (easier to make that no messages
are lost, faster roundtrip time, faster overall speed...) - honestly, how
many have run more than one smsbox (not counting tests)
--
&Kalle || http://iki.fi/rpr/
