I f you use an analogue modem you should set the line to 9600bps, if you use
ISDN the speed setting does not matter, but you have to tell the modem
emulation
to expect a V.110 connection.
Use minicom to talk to the modem directly. This way you can actually see
whether
you get a call (e.g. the modem reports "RING"). If you get a ring
indication, type
ATA to accept the call. You should then get something that looks like line
noise.
This are the LCP packets from the modem. If this works, you should try the
same
with mgetty, if it does not, you have to look for the error (either in the
phone's settings
or your setup).
I have done this lot's of times with different equipment: stone aged 9600bps
modems
from the attic, active ISDN cards with more processing power than the CPU
itself,
passive ISDN cards and PCMCIA GSM cards for wireless WAP serving (yep, a
completely unwired WAP server). If you know what you do, this should be
quite easy.
 
Regards
  Joerg

-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: manish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Montag, 20. August 2001 05:38
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: wap over udp ?

hi,
 
i have been trying for a long time but haven't been able to dialin to the pc
using nokia7110.
i'm using the sms services perfectly using the same phone
but when i try to make a dialin connection mgetty gets "ok"
for the init-chat but then it is waiting for something.
waiting ...     is what it stops at.
 
sometimes it gets something and says
wfr: waiting for 'RING'
...
junk on the line?
 
i'm using the configurations as told in the user guide.
 
can someone please tell me how is this connection supposed to work? i mean i
should have mgetty running
and i go to services in my nokia 7110 and press home,
then it dials it's on no.
all i get is "check service settings" which i have some 100 times and i have
also tried changing bit rates.
9600 on the mobile and 19200 on the ttysx port is the only
combination for which i get any response.
 
how does mgetty get the LCP datagram for initiating the autoppp request????
 
 
thanks
 
manish


Reply via email to