I have to qualify this message: IPv4 works fine without the qos tag, but PLMN gives:
2001-11-15 15:41:14 [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `10.1.25.120'. 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] INFO: PPG: Accept request </cgi-bin/wap-push.cgi> from <10.1.25.120> 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] DEBUG: PPG: Content-Type is multipart/related; boundary="332daf4c:ea30a33dc8:-714c"; type="application/xml; charset=UTF-8" 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart accepted 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] INFO: client address was <+491718997592>, accepted 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: doing semantic analysis for address type a phone number 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] DEBUG: PAP COMPILER: network or bearer does not accept PLMN address 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] WARNING: wrong type of address for requested bearer 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] DEBUG: PPG: send_bad_message_response: telling pi 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for `10.1.25.120'. 2001-11-15 15:41:14 [13] WARNING: PPG: pap control entity erroneous, the request unacceptable 2001-11-15 15:41:19 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area 0x81e4b68. 2001-11-15 15:41:19 [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for `10.1.25.120'. it seems bearer defaults to WSP instead of something sensible for the given address type. Regards J�rg > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: J�rg Pommnitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 15. November 2001 16:44 > An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Betreff: Kannel PPG seems to insist on qos element > > Hi Aarno, > it seems the PPG does not work without the <quality-of-service> > tag and network related attributes. According to the DTD this > tag is optional. Is this a bug? > > Regards > J�rg >
