Hi J�rg, J�rg Pommnitz wrote: > > I don't have a strong opinion in this matter, so I won't argue. > I would suggest, however, to make the communication of the > bearer more explicit. The current overloading of the > bearer/network_required fields seems hackish to me.
Yes. I will change that, so that bearer/network-required fields have allways tha same meaning. Aarno
