comments included:
--
Bruno David Rodrigues
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Flax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: CVS patches
> Hi Bruno,
>
> On 8 October 2001, Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
> > I'm now looking at your code.
> > You are forcing receiving sms's through ME memory, right ?
>
> No the code uses "SM" memory and defaults to that. All mobiles have
> "SM" memory. There is the option of using "ME" memory for phones which
> have it.
That's the point. 1st, ME should be faster than SM, if available. 2nd the
idea
of not routing through memory is to be possible to fall-back to last AT
behaviour
> > What about if some mobile doesn't work correctly with it ?
> > quote("SMSs go through memory - this is reliable, but only implemented
and
> > + tested on an Ericsson gm25 modem and falcom */")
>
> I believe it will work with almost all modems.
Don't belive in new buggy-mobile-phones :((((((((((((((
Have I told about the sms's that goes directly to nokia memory without
notice ?
(no "you have new message")
> > can should create a config var to select the mode, like with "receive =
1",
> > smsc_at
> > behaves just like now, receive=2 receives through ME and receive=3
receives
> > through SM
> >
> > (and we can go ahead and have receive=0 so the modem doesn't route
messages
> > to kannel. Sometimes when you have only one phone, it could be
neccessary to
> > send messages and let the phone receive the message without routing to
> > kannel)
>
> I see. I already have a variable for SM or ME memory operation, SM is the
> default. It is set at compile time and shouldn't be set by the regular
> user.
As I told you, ME memory should be faster than SM. What about if I want to
use ME instead of SM ? would I have to compile it ? and if I later connect
to
another modem that have only SM ? should I have to binaries ? (of cource we
can have a code that uses ME or switch automatically to SM if ME is not
detected)
> Why would anyone not want to route through memory ? Think of your own
> personal handset ... I have now set up kannel to work just the same way
> you operate it ! An SMS arrives for you and it goes through memory, you
> read from memory and delete from memory.
Because I've received 1300 sms's in 5 days and I don't want to use my sim
card memory (there's a limit of read/write operations)
It's different from the usage of a normal client
> You seem to want a new feature for Kannel where SMSs aren't received
> .... In order to do this ... you can set up smsc_at to not respond to
> received SMSs, however incoming SMSs are still read, but not dealt with.
I wanted sms's to stay on the phone without going to kannel, so I can send,
for example, a Logo to myself.
