On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:27, Anders Lindh wrote: > > I think this has to do with the way some of the SMSC's have been > implemented. The basic pattern is that the smsc code fires up a thread > or two, both of which rotate around an infinite loop. Depending on how > polling of incoming data is done, these loops may well consume a lot > processing power. This is what I noticed while implementing the smsc_cgw > code (or, I did precisely the same thing). I solved it by making the > threads sleep some small amount of time (with pollfd) while waiting for > data. >
In my case this is smsbox eating cpu, not bearerbox. br R.
