Ok, obvious. I guess I need a rest.... -----Mensaje original----- De: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: martes 29 de enero de 2002 16:47 Para: Angel Fradejas CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?
>Ok, I could rework my patch to take this into account. > >So we'd have > >smsbox global-sender >sms-service faked-sender >smsc default-sender >And of course an optional &from= in every message. > >And bearerbox behaviour would be > >&from= never overrideable by smsc default-sender >global-sender overrideable by smsc default-sender (only if applied by >smsbox) >faked-sender overrideable by smsc default-sender (only if applied by >smsbox) >an empty sender overrideable by smsc default-sender > >I do not know the impact of having message in bearerbox with an empty >sender. Will any driver complain about that? > >Before going any further with this implementation, I would like to hear what >to do if a message goes all the way to bearerbox with an empty sender and >there's not default-sender. you can set the default sender in smsbox but have a flag indicate that it can be overriden by a more specific default (smsc specific one). -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting ------------------------------------------------------------------ Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink
