Hello Stipe,
Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 11:54:54 PM, you wrote:
ST> Oleg Taranov wrote:
>> Why do you need to use 9202?
ST> keep in mind that some devices are only capable of connectionless
ST> mode, so even for WTLS then. I don't know which ones, but I guess
ST> there may be some. At least followin the specs what Charles tries
ST> *should* be possible and reasonable.
ok. I guess it's necessary to check for identity of the protocols.
>> there is error in mk_cert.c so certificates are non-workable.
>> there are memory leaks in kwtls that inherited from 3ui code.
>>
>> has it sense to fix it in this contribution?
ST> yes, why not. At least if the fix is not to big.
in mk_cert.c - 1 byte
I've started to fix memory leaks but stopped after announce
from 3glab about finalisation a built-in wtls. The work is not so hard
but very boring... I saw wtls has been asked not so frequently.
ST> I think as far as we don't have working WTLS stuff inside Kannel
ST> itself, users may rely on kwtls in combination.
ST> But this should be considered as temporary kludge. I would like to
ST> enforce further development on getting Kannel's own WTLS stack
ST> implemented and working.
What is state of built-in wtls implementation?
--
Best regards,
Oleg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
