I second this. gwthread_sleep does what you want right now or
I'm missing something.
Regards
J�rg
-----Original Message-----
From: Oded Arbel
To: Alex Judd; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/20/02 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: Modification of gwthread_sleep for SMPP throttling
I don't think I understand. as gwthread_sleep accepts times in double
and not integer, its easy to sleep for less then a second. for example -
I usually use gwthread_sleep(0.1) which sleeps for a tenth of a second.
what's wrong with the current implementation ?
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"Some say life is hell and death an escape, others say heaven awaits us
in the world beyond, but either way I need a new pair of shoes."
-- Privateer.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Judd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Modification of gwthread_sleep for SMPP throttling
>
>
> In order to add (hopefully nice) throttling to the SMPP
> driver I'd like
> to modify the behaviour of the gwthread_sleep function in
> gwthread-pthread.c very slightly.
>
> Currently the function receives the amount of seconds to sleep as a
> double, multiplies it by 1000 to get that value in
> milliseconds and then
> sleeps for that amount of time in milliseconds.
>
> What I'd like to do is if the function recieves a value of < 1 as the
> number of seconds to sleep for, that it instead assumes this
> to be the
> number of milliseconds to sleep for, skips the *1000 part and
> sleeps for
> this time instead.
>
> This way I can sleep nicely for < 1 second periods.
>
> Any objections to this before I do so?
>
> Regards
>
> Alex
>
> --
> Alex Judd
> http://www.skywire.co.uk/
> http://www.enpocket.com/
>
>
>
>
