On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:50:59AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Uoti and the other: > > > > at the end of conn_register, or (a cleaner way) by adding a > > > > lock_out/unlock_out pair at the start of conn_destroy.
Hmm... if conn_destroy is being called in a context where it is still possible that some other process has a lock on the connection, then something is wrong. conn_destroy should only be called on connections that are definitely not in use anymore. Richard Braakman
