I'm commiting a patch where the keepalive timeout is only restarted on sending an operation 31 or 51. Is it ok for you ?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gildas PERROT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Devel@Kannel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:27 PM Subject: REPOST : Problem with keepalive feature of emi2 and receive-port configuration Hi, I am trying to sum up what has been said about keepalive of emi2 when using receive-port. Here is my configuration, MT are sent on one connection to my broker and MO are received on another connection (receive-port defined). I want to maintain MT connection active since my broker needs it and I was thinking to use UCP31 for that purpose. The problem is that if UCP52 are received, the keepalive timeout is restarted but is should not be since UCP31 are only sent on the MT connection (I checked with tcpdump). Am I right ? If yes, is it possible for somebody to modify Kannel code in order to not take UCP52 in account for the keepalive timeout restarting ? My other question is : is it better to use a bidirectional connection (MT and MO on the same connection) ? Thanks in advance for your help. Gildas. PS : I am using the last CVS version. --- Gildas PERROT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fluxus, 30, rue du Château des Rentiers, 75647 Paris Cedex 13 __o http://www.fluxus.net ---_`\<,_ Fluxus est une société B.T. Ignite ----- (_)/ (_)
