----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bruno David Simões Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:44 AM Subject: Re: [RFY] Unicode in MO Messages and other patch
> >> > (and hints for having a range of short-numbers redirected to one > >> >connection, or > >> >having the numbers +351999* are apreciated too) > >> > >> What speaks against having multiple sessions, one for every service > >> number? Every session would have its own login, like a separate > >> customer. > > > >Receiving from 3000 to 3999 ? ;) > > that will be a long config file but how else would kannel separate > the different parties? if your config does not deal with the > destination number who will? If you say that smsc should send to kannel the number used by the client, it's easy to code kannel to interpret the b-number. Of course when smsc gives me allways an ip/number, I would't know the destination number...
