Having a preferred-smsc would do what you want in most cases (unless the specified smsc is not online, in that case, kannel would route it to another smsc in absence of allowed-smc/denied-smsc.
group = smsc smsc-id = testsmsc1 preferred-smsc-id = testsmsc1 Hope it helps. Angel Fradejas. -----Mensaje original----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Bruno David Rodrigues Enviado el: mi�rcoles 20 de marzo de 2002 17:25 Para: Alex Judd; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: msg->sms.smsc_id versus cfg_get(grp, octstr_imm("smsc-id")) it's not easy to do that in the current code. You'll have to have a preferred-smsc in your smsc group or even an allowed-smsc/denied-smsc what I'm thinking to do is to have a default prefered smsc, like if the message has a msg.smscid=A, it should preferelly go through A ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Judd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:17 PM Subject: msg->sms.smsc_id versus cfg_get(grp, octstr_imm("smsc-id")) > I think I'm trying to convince Kannel to do something that it doesn't want > to do and appreciate some input from the list. > > Objective: Receive /cgi-bin/sendsms message and send through specific SMS > > What happens is that when I specify the smsc= parameter to try and force > the message to go through that SMSC it is tagging the message as coming > from that SMSC, rather than sending it through the SMSC I specify > > The SMSC it sends through seems to be random depending on which thread it > wakes up and that SMSC has it's ID specified in the configuration file. > > Therefore what I'd like to do is when we go to wakeup or create the SMSC > needed, to create it according to the msg->sms.smsc == cfg_get(grp, > octstr_imm("smsc-id")) rather than being random > > Does this sound correct and where in the process does Kannel decide which > smsc to connect to? > > Thanks in advance > > Alex > > -- > Alex Judd > http://www.skywire.co.uk > > >
