----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:54 PM Subject: PID bug?
> My guys worked overtime this week sending EMS's with kannel, > and they report that they were not able to send PID's properly > with Bruno's new PID support, until they made a few changes. > It's apparently working for us (EMI2) now. uh? PID is a simple byte field in UCP. What could gone wrong ? I'm sucessfully using PID in UCP and AT2, for SIM Toolkit (PID=127), "ping" (64) and replace message (65->) (BTW: My Ericsson T68 doesn't even receive correctly the ping and replace messages: it ignores ping and it's funny with replace: if I have one message in memory and send a pid=65 message, my mobile will have two copies of the old message (and three and more if more messages are sent) and nowhere is the new message) > I will ask the guys if they have any diffs to contribute > Monday, hope that's not too late. Send the diffs so I can see what's happening > Also, we are having problems with reassembly > of long 8-bit SMS, with all headers (including concatenation > headers) precreated. These same PDU's sent directly work fine, > but Kannel seems to mangle them still. Another strange thing... I'm sending too long text messages and picture messages with UCP and AT2..... > > More info Monday. > > ____________________________________________ > Steve Rapaport > CTO, A-Tono > > > -- Bruno David Rodrigues Vodafone Telecel Portugaldeve
