Yep. And even the memory leak should be fixed. It is not even static. ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Aarno Syvanen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:58 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Kannel version 1.1.5-1 fault tolerance and memory leaks
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aarno Syvanen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1). If I send an empty UDP packet to the WAP box, it does not > > > > serve any more. > > > > (I have to restart the service.) > > > > Can you report your settings with more details ? > > >followings are extracted from /var/log/kannel/wapbox.log > > >2002-04-19 12:41:51 [2] WARNING: WSP UNIT: Empty datagram. > >2002-04-19 12:45:51 [2] WARNING: WSP UNIT: Empty datagram. > >2002-04-19 12:51:51 [2] WARNING: WSP UNIT: Empty datagram. > >2002-04-19 12:55:52 [2] WARNING: WSP UNIT: Empty datagram. > >2002-04-19 12:56:20 [2] WARNING: WSP UNIT: Empty datagram. > > >It seems that connectionless WSP code logs empty datagram > >properly but does not release memory in this case. Can > >you fix this, > > ^^^ means who? > > > >having a stress test program for wap helps > >in this regard. > > >fresh starting actually at: > > size res > > Wapbox: 8048K 4160K > > Bearbox: 7680K 3760K > > > > > > > > > After 239,000 hits: > > > > size res > > > > Wapbox: 8912K 5552K > > > > Bearbox: 10M 6040K > > > > Yes, bearerbox leak no hopefully fixed, thanks > ^^ > >should be now? > > >Yeah. I actually run stress tests one hour, 350 msg/s, with no non-static > >leaks in bearerbox. > > So you have a new version now? > > >Wapbox leak is smallish, because empty > >message is an exception. > > OK. However, it does not serve anymore if > being sent an empty UDP packet, which is > fatal. > > Cheers > James Wang > > > > > >
