At 01:01 PM 5/6/02 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>Benjamin Lee schrieb:
>
>looks good for me, +1 for commitment, any other opinions?
yeah +1 for me.. except that the generic nack can be used by the SMSC for
ESME_RTHROTTLED. I have the following for generic_nack_resp
case generic_nack_resp:
{
error(0, "SMPP: NACK PDU type 0x%08lx, "
"code 0x%08lx.",
pdu->type, pdu->u.generic_nack_resp.command_status);
if (pdu->u.generic_nack_resp.command_status ==
0x58) //ESME_RTHROTTLED
{
warning(0, "SMPP: nack: %s
ESME_RTHROTTLED. Re re queuing",octstr_get_cstr(smpp->conn->name));
reason = smpp_status_to_smscconn_failure_reason(
pdu->u.submit_sm.command_status);
bb_smscconn_send_failed(smpp->conn, msg, reason);
--(*pending_submits);
}
}
break;
nisan
>Stipe
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Wapme Systems AG
>
>Münsterstr. 248
>40470 Düsseldorf
>
>Tel: +49-211-74845-0
>Fax: +49-211-74845-299
>
>E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>wapme.net - wherever you are
