if you want to use the native malloc, then configure it with malloc=native. I don't
know what the memory limit is in native malloc, but I assume there are none. if you
are using a checking malloc, and want to use a bigger memory pool then you'll have to
change the malloc code in gwlib/gwmem-check.c and then recompile with that. it has no
relevance to the ammount of physical memory available at compile time.
--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(972)-67-340014
(972)-9-9581711 (ext: 116)
::..
I suppose when it gets to that point, we shan't know how it does it.
-- Turing
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cold Feet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: version 1.1.6 processing limits
>
>
> hi oded,
>
> what do you mean by recompile....
> if i have recompiled it on a 256MB memory before
> and this time i want to upgrade to 1GB memory, i have
> to recompile it again? is there any other parameters or flags
> which i have to include like malloc=native?
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Oded Arbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:14:20 +0300
> To: "Cold Feet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: version 1.1.6 processing limits
>
>
> > I'm not sure how "native" malloc works, but the checking
> malloc (which we use always) has an upper limit on the number
> of allocations allowed. if you want to use more memory you
> will have to recompile.
> >
> > --
> > Oded Arbel
> > m-Wise Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (972)-67-340014
> > (972)-9-9581711 (ext: 116)
> >
> > ::..
> > "All books can be indecent books, but recent books are bolder;
> > For filth, I'm glad to say, is in the mind of the beholder.
> > When correctly viewed, everything is lewd!
> > I could tell you things about Peter Pan
> > (and the Wizard of Oz, there's a dirty old man) ..."
> > --Tom Lehrer
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Cold Feet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:16 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: version 1.1.6 processing limits
> > >
> > >
> > > hi again,
> > >
> > > does it help and give better result if i upgrade the memory
> > > to say 1GB from its present 256MB configuration? since kannel
> > > is thread oriented in implementation, it uses memory to
> > > handle transactions, if i have more memory in place, then it
> > > could handle more threads at a given time... correct me if i
> > > am wrong... anyhow, this is just my thoughts...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Oded Arbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 11:03:09 +0300
> > > To: "Cold Feet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: RE: version 1.1.6 processing limits
> > >
> > >
> > > > This question should be asked on the users list.
> > > > In recent test we've run, we pushed about 25 messages a
> > > second, which
> > > > was limited mostly by our middle tier setup then by
> > > kannel. I estimate
> > > > that Kannel alone can go much higher then that.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Oded Arbel
> > > > m-Wise Inc.
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > (972)-67-340014
> > > > (972)-9-9581711 (ext: 116)
> > > >
> > > > ::..
> > > > X windows:
> > > > A new level of software disintegration.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Cold Feet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:57 AM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: version 1.1.6 processing limits
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > for the first month of being up on kannel 1.1.6 development
> > > > > release it has its ups and downs on its live run. on its
> > > > > first week several times it went down by itself... and so i
> > > > > recompiled it with additional flags and now have remained up
> > > > > and running and i can say i am to the point that i may say,
> > > > > the system and compilation issue is now stable for my server.
> > > > > however, i need a gauge on its processing limits. the system
> > > > > is handling sms only data and wap is disabled. and so far
> > > > > just a few number of sms is being received and replied to. i
> > > > > am hitting about 6,000 received sms in a day. all i know that
> > > > > this is just a small number to speak with. i would like to
> > > > > ask your input then, how much data can kannel process at any
> > > > > given time whereby it is really pushed to the limits. how
> > > > > many messages can it process in a given second or minute? to
> > > > > process a huge number of sms data, i need to have a good
> > > > > amount of RAM. i am using redhat linux 7.2 on an intel
> > > > > pentium III 866 mhz with 256MB of SD!
> > > > > RA!
> > > > > M. what do you think is a good server configuration to
> > > setup kannel.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks....
> > > > > --
> > > > > Surfy! http://www.surfy.com Great web search, free web
> > > > > email, and $9.95 unlimited Internet access
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Powered by Outblaze
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Surfy! http://www.surfy.com Great web search, free web
> > > email, and $9.95 unlimited Internet access
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Powered by Outblaze
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Surfy! http://www.surfy.com Great web search, free web
> email, and $9.95 unlimited Internet access
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
>
