Actually, Kannel supports HTTPS for the send-sms interface, so using that is a much
easier to get secure message transmission then any other way - seeing as HTTP over SSL
is a widely supported communication method, and you can easily get free or proprietary
libraries that do HTTPS for any language.
As for ease of use - HTTP is still easier to implement in most languages then any
other communication protocols - again, as it so popular that some languages even have
built-in support for HTTP calls.
Using sockets or RPC or database has other benefits, for example : performance. but
even so - implementing other send-sms interfaces is not a high priority. none the
less, you are more then invited to do it yourself, in the spirit of open source
development :-)
--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Mobile Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +972-67-340014
Tel: +972-9-9581711 (ext: 116)
::..
While Linux is larger than Emacs, at least Linux has the excuse that it needs to be.
--Linus Torvalds
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Le Nhu Hai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Gateway of the Gateway
>
>
>
>
> Hi Kannel developer,
>
> After a time using Kannel as gateway of SMS service, I see
> that there's
> only one way to send message from other application to the smsbox
> through URL. Sould you make any other way to send message to smsbox,
> such through socket? This way can be more secure than sending by URL
> and easier to develop other application that send sms to smsbox.
>
> Thanks,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
>
>
