> I think it's a stupid idea that is hard to implement and beyond
> the scope of Kannel. You can always transform the XML-data on the
> client side.
I think I have to explain why I consider this a stupid idea. The point of
XSLT
is, that you can transform XML streams to conform to different formats
(DTDs).
That's why it's common sense to apply the transformation as close to the
final
user as possible.
See, if you would apply the transformation in Kannel, you would get
something like this:
HTTP
Kannel ---> Transformer + XSLT -----> Consumer
If you make the XSLT transformation at the client side, you get
HTTP
Kannel ------> Transformer + XSLT1 -----> Consumer 1
Transformer + XSLT2 -----> Consumer 2
Transformer + XSLT3 -----> Consumer 3
See? Transformation at the client side is much more flexible and
the way it is supposed to be.
Regards
Joerg
