Oded Arbel wrote: > > Right you are - haven't thought about that one :-) > > +1 from me, as it is now (i.e : haven't thought of a cute format hack to address the >gwqdiff negative issue).
should this be considered a bug or a feature? In other words, should it go in before tagging 1.2.0 or into the later development branch? At least it's in STATUS file now. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
