> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 11:30 AM
> To: Harrie Hazewinkel
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [FYI] critical bug in EMI2 module
>
>
> > > So who's +1 for releasing 1.1.7? Votes from the
> contributors please.
> > > BTW, is the version number plan right with 1.1.7 as development
> > > version, which is *newer* than 1.2.0 but the version
> number is less?!
> >
> > I would advise against this. The numbering scheme is not
> inconsistent.
> > Almost every one would say 1.2.0 is a newer release then 1.1.7.
> > And this also depends on how and where you want to branch/tag from.
>
> are you for releasing development version as 1.1.7 or 1.3.x? I didn't
> get the essentials from this statement, sorry Harrie.
I'd say neither : continue development on the HEAD branch, and don't version it. the
"Service Release" will be labeled 1.2.1, which will simply be a snapshot of the
current HEAD.
--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise mobile solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-9-9581711
+972-67-340014
::..
Fish lurk in streams.
-- Rochester, New York, Democrat & Chronicle, January 29
