Hi Oded, I was sure you think this way, as you did the code :-) but as it don't works for me I was trying to listen some other opinion here. I trust you about the GSM 03.40 specs but maybe there is something we don't know. Andrea ----- Original Message ----- From: Oded Arbel To: Andrea Viscovich ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 8:36 PM Subject: RE: DLR (at2)
This looks correct. the only thing a DLR do is to turn on the TP-SRR bit in the MT-SUBMIT header byte. check the GSM 03.40 specs, but it looks correct to me. -- Oded Arbel m-Wise mobile solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-9-9581711 (116) +972-67-340014 ::.. Anna: "You know what they say about men with big feet ?" William: "No, I don't, actually. What's that?" Anna: "Big feet... large shoes..." -- Notting Hill -----Original Message----- From: Andrea Viscovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DLR (at2) Here is ouput of the at command Withouth dlr request AT2[A]: --> 0011000C919343973326020000A70570F9DB1E06 ^ with dlr request AT2[A]: --> 0031000C919343973326020000A70570F9DB1E06 ^ As You see the only difference is in the third bit. I'm asking you if this is right, as I'm not rceiving back any dlr from smsc. I'm sure smsc supports dlr. Thanks Andrea
