IMO the current CVS version is stable enough for deployment, considering the
infrastructure and boxes. each driver may have issues seperatly, but I feel that each
of the drivers I'm familiar with is safe enough for deployment on production.
This mostly because of the "no risk" attitude of the CVS commit policy - things get
into the CVS only _after_ testing..
--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise mobile solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-9-9581711 (116)
+972-67-340014
::..
Avoid overly pretentious job titles such as "Lord of the Realm, Defender of the
Faith, Emporer of Siberia" or "Director of Corporate Planning".
-- The Official MBA Handbook on business cards
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mauricio Ramos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 8:07 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: Oded Arbel
> Subject: Kannel 1.2.0 with a major BUG VERSUS current CVS?
>
>
> Hi Fellows,
>
> I'm actually not aware of every change on current CVS but
> would like to know
> your opinions wheter current CVS is stable as 1.2.0 or not.
>
> Indeed, I'd rather to deploy version 1.2.0 but this still
> have a major bug
> regarding DLR and resending of malformed messages (SMPP driver).
>
> Is it possible to somebody fix that bug in new 1.2.1 stable
> version or shall
> I use the current CVS for production purposes?
>
> Tnx!
>
