The line ./configure --with-wtls=openssl goes for if you compile kannel
yourself from source.
The RPM package contains just binaries, precompiled for a certain set of
libraries... which (obviously) do not match yours.

If you know anything about cvs, I recommend you check out the cvs version of
kannel which is far ahead of the downloadable stable release.
And otherwise download the latest stable kannel sources from kannel.org.

If you never compiled something yourself (or don't know what a makefile is)
then I suggest you get some help with that.

Mind that -as said- wtls support is experimental.

-- Rene Kluwen
   Chimit Communications

--------
This email message has been automatically scanned for viri using Sophos
antivirus.
--------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ivone Uribe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: WAPKANNEL Configuration_9203/openssl/Urgent!


> Hi Mark an Stipe!
> thanks!
>
> Well, we have severals types of motorola handsets, but I'm using the
> motorola i550plus and the i30sx for the proves.
>
> My OS is the Red Hat 7.2,  I had problems when I  installed the Kannel, I
> got this message :
>
> " libcrypto.so.0.9.6 and  libssl.so.0.9.6 needed by kennel-1.2.01" and
> conflicts with the chkconfig.
>
> For Red Hat 7.2  I have the openssl-0.9.6b-28 and openssl-devel-0.9.6b-28
> and it has /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6b and the /lib/libssl.so.0.9.6b, but not
> the "/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6"
>
> So, I wrote  --force --nodeps  for the installation of the kannel rpm.
> So I'm thinking it could be a cause why I can't open the port 9203 WTLS.
>
> What do you mean, I have to write in the installation $ ./configure
> --with-wtls=openssl for avoid this message in the installation of the
kannel
> rpm:
> " libcrypto.so.0.9.6 and  libssl.so.0.9.6 needed by kennel-1.2.01" and
> "conflicts with the chkconfig"
> ?
>
> I'm thinking installing the libcrypto.so.0.9.6 and  libssl.so.0.9.6 needed
> by kennel-1.2.01,
> but  the libssl.so.0.9.6 are in openssl-0.9.6-1.i386.html (Secure Sockets
> Layer and cryptography libraries and tools Libc6 Contribs for i386/
> openssl-0.9.6-1.i386.rpm ), the problem is that the distribution is not by
> RedHat, could it be a problem?
> Does the  openssl-0.9.6-1.i386.html is supported by the RedHat 7.2 or 6.2?
> I'm thinking installing the kannel 6.2, but I don't know if the Kannel
will
> have conflicts with the openssl, too.
>
> Please Help Me!! What can I do? :(
>
> Regards,
> Ivone
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Ivone Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: WAP KANNEL Configuration_9203
> >Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:30:45 +0200
> >
> > > Unfortunately, it's impossible for us to set the phone to be 9201.
> >
> >that's why I don't like Motorola phones at all :)
> >
> > > So, what can I do to use the WAP secure session service 9203
(Protocol:
> > > WSP/WTP/WTLS/Datagram)?
> > > Kannel only listens to the ports 9200, 9201 and 9202 but if I want
that
> > > Kannel supports the "WAP secure session service": 9203 what can I do?
> > > Where can I have to do the changes?
> >
> >Kannel has a WTLS stack implemented and this can be activated at
> >configure time using the
> >
> >   $ ./configure --with-wtls=openssl
> >
> >as example. BEWARE: the WTLS stack is yet not fully functional and
> >should be considered as alpha quality in the code.
> >
> >Stipe
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Wapme Systems AG
> >
> >Vogelsanger Weg 80
> >40470 Düsseldorf
> >
> >Tel: +49-211-74845-0
> >Fax: +49-211-74845-299
> >
> >E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >wapme.net - wherever you are
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Fotos: la forma más fácil de compartir e imprimir fotos.
> http://photos.msn.es/support/worldwide.aspx
>
>


Reply via email to