Nisan Bloch schrieb: > > At 08:02 PM 11/20/02 +0100, Andreas Fink wrote: > > >how about simply numbering the SMSC's? > > > >or do something like > > > >smsc=link1 start/stops all "link1" links > > > >smsc=5 start/stops the 5th link > > > >smsc=link1:1 start/stops the 1st link of the group "link1" > > > > I like this.. We could alter the status page to display a "link number". > Small change though > smsc=link1 start/stops all "link1" links > smsc=link1:1 start/stops the 1st link of the group "link1" > smsc-no=5 start/stops the 5th link > > Otherwise smsc-ids that are a numeric (silly, but it may happen), will > cause problems.
yep, I don't thing numbering would be good in this case. To be honest I'd rather tend to avoid this hacky packy numbering and agree to the previous thought that a stop/start operation should apply to all smsc links that carry that specific smsc-id. Would this solve all your issues?! I mean this is fairly ok, because it does not break the behaviour if you have a group of links that are not named the same and logically some may start/stop them with their unique smsc-id. So at least nothing would break in our systems :) > We should think about getting the stop /start to reload the config file for > that link. This way we can change the configuration and simply stop/start > that link, rahter than bouncing Kannel. ?? explain that please. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
