-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
I agree with Bruno. +1 from me (if I may to vote?)... On Saturday 04 January 2003 16:34, Bruno David Sim�es Rodrigues wrote: > Citando Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi guys, > > > > I asked what the versioning should look like for the upcoming > > development release?! Should I name it 1.3.0 or then 1.3.1 for the > > stabilized version or 1.3.0rc1? > > Just tag it as 1.3.0. If it's a development branch, it doesn't need to be > "stable". Then tag 1.3.1, 1.3.2 as soon as someone implements something > "big" and we need to know "1.3.2 was before implementing xpto and > everything was working". > > PS: Stipe: I was in D�sseldorf some weeks ago and I've tried to call you > and a "nice operator girl" said that your number was not assigned > (something like that for what I understood from german :) - -- Best Regards / Mit besten Gr��en aus K�ln Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___________________________________ Centrium GmbH Ehrenstrasse 2 50672 K�ln Fon: +49 (0221) 277 49 150 Fax: +49 (0221) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.centrium.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Fw2FnX3e5W+uJ0ERAr/CAJ4v6CY/mAehxjzDL+ajc2d1IRogaQCgo1tk pHZJBel5k/xSVA1tbgQ6CA8= =ZZuj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
