On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 04:47, Bruno David S=?ISO-8859-1?B?aW31ZXMgUm9kcmlndWVz?= wrote: > Citando Nicholas Rahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi list, > > > > Attached is a patch implementing the validity period (relative) for > > CIMD2 connections. It has been tested with one of our swiss CIMD2 > > connections. > > > > The documentation for the "validity" parameter (sendsms interface) in > > the User's Guide does not mention that this functionality might not be > > implemented for certain SMSC types. > > A quick search for validity shows: > Can set Validity > ? ? ? ? y ? ? ? ? y ? ? > > We can't mention for each parameter that "this might work or might not work for > depending on connected smsc". > > Better solution is to ask smsc developers to implement it and fix documentation ;)
Best solution is for me to actually read that section of the documentation before complaining. ;-) When i get a few free minutes, I'll try to create a patch for the doc to add a 'y' to the "Can set Validity" section for cimd2. nick
