Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > > Don't we have a "forced-smsc-id" in sendsms ? please use it instead of smsc-id > to maintain consistency ;)
yep, that's for the sendsms-user group, *not* for the wap-push-user group. They are not the same. I agree that we may name the "smsc-id" config directive in the wap-push-user group better "force-smsc" in compliance with the same behaviour for the sendsms-user group. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
