Hmm,
Won't this patch helps greatly in tracking status requests?
We could use this instead of playing around with dlr-url.
Furthermore, suppose we have a listener that forwards messages to bearerbox,
the bearerbox now can notify the listener back with this ack/nack message. Is this correct?
Rgds
Rachman
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:55:24 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>looks good. I'm just wondering how we may react on a receive in the
>smsbox of the ack messages. Currently they are not handled there at
>all.
