Hi, does it mean that it would be up to the user's application in order to submit _valid_ timestamp? so I wish to make message validity 2 days long, everytime I have to calculate "future" timestamp, ie. localtime() + 2*24*60. shouldn't it be done somehow automatically?
regards, Dziugas Baltrunas On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Alexander Malysh wrote: > Hi list, > > i would be like to ask, why are validity and deferred in kannel in minutes > instead of e.g. unix timestamp. I can see that all driver convert this to > unix timestamp like this: gw_localtime(...) + validity*60... > > Second point is that if message can't be send immediately (e.g. Link was > offline) then our validity and deferred values are not correct, because we > allways increase our localtime with validity/deferred value. > > I believe, deferred/validity values must be absolut instead of relativ to > sendtime... > > Should we change validity and deferred values to unix timestamps to avoid > unnecessary converting and wrong values? > > Comments please ... > > -- > Best Regards / Mit besten Gr��en aus K�ln > > Dipl.-Ing. > Alexander Malysh > ___________________________________ > > Centrium GmbH > Ehrenstrasse 2 > 50672 K�ln > > Fon: +49 (0221) 277 49 240 > Fax: +49 (0221) 277 49 109 > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web: http://www.centrium.de > msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
