Hi Paul, Paul Keogh schrieb: > > > > our REFPOOL tests are doing well. Handset manufacturers > > claim the lack > > > of UAProf support within Kannel. > > Is there any more details about these "claims" - ie. what exactly are > they claiming is missing ?
now basically they complain that Kannel does not check the UAProf profile of a device and hence does not recognize that certain mime-types can or can't be accepted by the device. > > > Can someone please check if UAProf is a mandatory feature for WAP > > > 1.2.1 (jun)? > > > Is there anyone interested to pick this issue up and work on it? > > > > The Profile, Profile-Diff and Profile-Warning HTTP headers are all defined, > as is the uaprof content type in WSP 1.2.1. > > Is the question what the gateway should do with this information, other than > pass it on to the HTTP server ? yes, I guess UAProf is not only about passing the information. It is also about dealing with it in terms of allowing to modify mime-types to fit the needs of the device. Or am I wrong here? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
